Morphological features of the inflorescence in jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) accessions from the VIR collection
https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2018-4-128-140
Abstract
Background. Jerusalem artichoke (Heliánthus tuberósus L.) is a valuable crop grown for feed, food, industrial and medicinal purposes. Studying biological, geographic, environmental, taxonomic and other features of this species is a vital task, whose solution will help, first of all, to disclose the variability of its traits, develop its intraspecific system, and work out methods for researching into the morphology of Jerusalem artichoke. Analyzing morphological features of its inflorescence and flower is one of the basic components of such a study. Materials and methods. The material for the research was the collection of Jerusalem artichoke maintained in a live condition at Maikop Experiment Station. The inflorescences of 58 accessions were analyzed to investigate eleven traits. Statistical analysis was carried out using StatSoft’s Statistica 13.0 software package. Results and conclusion. The greatest differences among the groups, formed according to geographic origin, were observed in the number of inflorescences per plant and the number of false ligulate florets in the inflorescence. The length of tubular florets was constant within the species, being 1.4 cm; as the most stable trait, this descriptor probably may be used as a diagnostic tool for this species. The accession ‘Sakhalinsky Krasny 4’ (Sakhalin population of Japanese origin) was the most distinctive, as regards the set of its characteristics.
About the Authors
T. N. SmekalovaRussian Federation
N. V. Lebedeva
Russian Federation
L. Yu. Novikova
Russian Federation
A. V. Ljubchenko
Russian Federation
References
1. Breton C., Kiru S. D., Berville A., Anushkevich N. Yu. Breeding of Jerusalem Artichoke with the desired traits for different directions of use: retrospective, approaches and prospects (review) (Selekciya topinambura (Helianthus tuberósus L.) dlya netradicionnogo ispol’zovaniya: retrospective, podhody i perspektivy (obzor) // Sel’skohozjaistvenneya biologiya – Agricultural Biology, 2017, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 940–951 [in Russian]
2. Castellini C., Constantini F., Fantozzi P. Utilization of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) fibrous residue as feed for rabbit // 3rd International Conference on Leaf Protein Research, LEAF-PRO – 89, Italy, October 1989, pp. 162–165.
3. Davydovich S. S. Topinambur hybridization // Breeding and seed production,1936, vol. 6, pp. 20–26
4. Davydovich S. S. Gibridizaciya topinambura. Selekciya i semenovodstvo, 1936, vol. 6, pp. 20–26 [in Russian]
5. Dergacheva N. V., Kazydub N. G. Dergacheva N. V., Kazydub N. G. Tuber-bearing crops (potato, Jerusalem artichoke, sweet potato, manioc, taro, yam): Study guide // Omsk: OmGAU, 2011, 208 p.
6. Dergacheva N. V., Kazydub N. G. Klubnenosnye kul'tury (kartofel', topinambur, batat, maniok, taro, yams): uchebnoe posobie. Omsk. gos. agrar. un-t im. P. A. Stolypina [in Russian]
7. Duke J. A., 1983. Handbook of Energy Crops. NewCROPS web site, Purdue University.https://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/duke_energy/dukeindex.html.
8. Filep R. Biogeographic perspectives of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L. s. l.) invasion /University of Pecs, Doctoral School of Biology and Sport Biology, Pecs, 2018, 97 p.
9. Ignatov M. S., Makarov V. V., Chichev A. V. Abstract of the Moscow region adventive plants Flora. Floristic studies in the Moscow region. Moscow : Science, 1990, pp. 5–105.
10. Ignatov M. S., Makarov V. V., Chichev A. V. Konspekt flory adventivnyh rastenij Moskovskoj oblasti. Floristicheskie issledovaniya v Moskovskoj oblasti. Moscow : Nauka, 1990, pp. 5–105 [in Russian]
11. Kays S. J., Kultur F. Genetic variation in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) flowering date and duration. HortScience, 2005, vol. 40, p. 1675–1678.
12. Kays S. J., Nottingham S. F. 2008. Biology and Chemistry of Jerusalem Artichoke Helianthus tuberosus L. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, USA http://www.crcnetbase.com/isbn/9781420044966/
13. Lebedeva N. V., Smekalova T. N., Novikova L. Yu., Kiru S. D. Morfologicheskie osobennosti vegetativnyh organov topinambura (Helianthus tuberosus L., Asteraceae) v svyazi s problemoj vnutrividovoj sistematiki// Sbornik tezisov Vtoroj vserossijskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem «Sornye rasteniya v izmenyayushchemsya mire: aktual'nye voprosy izucheniya raznoobraziya, proiskhozhdeniya, ehvolyucii» (27-28 noyabrya 2017, St. Peterburg, Rossiya), St. Petersburg, 2017, pp. 81–82 [in Russian]
14. Pas'ko N. M. Biological features of Jerusalem artichoke // Bulletin of applied botany, genetics and plant breeding. 1973, vol. 50, fasc. 2. pp. 102–122 [in Russian]
15. Pas'ko N. M. The biology of Jerusalem artichoke flowering // Scientific works of the Maikop experimental station of the All-Russian Research Institute of Plant Industry. 1974, vol. 8, pp. 235–250).
16. Pas'ko N. M. Biologiya cveteniya topinambura // Nauchnye trudy Majkopskoj opytnoj stancii VNII rastenievodstva. 1974, iss. 8, pp. 235–250 [in Russian]
17. Pas'ko N. M. Helianthus tuberosus L. (morphology, classification, biology, initial material for breeding): doctoral thesis of agricultural sciences, L., 1989, 454 p.
18. Pas'ko N. M. Helianthus tuberosus L. (morfologiya, klassifikaciya, biologiya, iskhodnyj material dlya selekcii): diss... dokt. s.-h. nauk. Leningrad, 1989. 454 p. [in Russian]
19. Pas'ko N. M. Jerusalem artichoke – biotechnological potential for food, medical, technical, feed and ecological purposes // http:// ww.agroyug.ru/page/item/_id-2476/. Appeal date 28.08.2018.
20. Pas'ko N. M. Topinambur – biotekhnologicheskij potencial dlya pishchevyh, lechebnyh, tekhnicheskih, kormovyh i ekologicheskih celej// http://www.agroyug.ru/page/item/_id-2476/ Data obrashcheniya 28.08.2018 [in Russian]
21. Puttha R., Jogloy S., Suriharn B., Wangsomnuk P. P., Kesmala T., Patanothai A. Variations in morphological and agronomic traits among Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) accessions / Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 2013, 60 (2): 731–746. DOI: 10.1007/s10722- 012-9870-2).
22. Rawate P. D., Hill R. M. Extraction of a high-protein isolate from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) tops and evaluation of its nutrition potential. // J. Agric. Food Chem., 1985.33 (1), pp. 29–31.
23. Shchibrya N. A. Selection of Jerusalem artichoke // In the book: Theoretical bases of plant breeding, Moscow; Leningrad, 1937, vol. 3, pp. 162–175
24. Shchibrya N. A. Selekciya topinambura // In : Teoreticheskie osnovy selekcii rastenij. Moscow ; Leningrad, 1937, vol. 3, pp. 162–175 [inRussian]
25. Swanton C. J. (1986). Ecological Aspects of Growth and Development of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.): Ph. D. thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, 124 p.
26. Ustimenko G. V.Jerusalem Artichoke (Zemlynaya grusha). Moscow : Gos. izdatel'stvo sel'skohozyajstvennoj literatury, 1960, 100 p. [in Russian]
27. Vinogradova Yu. K., Majorov S. R., Horun L. V. Sunflower tuberiferous, Jerusalem Artichoke // Black Book of Central Russia Flora. Alien plant species in the ecosystems of Central Russia / RAN; GBS RAN im. N. N. Cicina. Moscow : GEOS, 2009, pp. 188–194
28. Vinogradova Yu. K., Majorov S. R., Horun L. V. Podsolnechnik klubnenosnyj, Topinambur // Chyornaya kniga flory Srednej Rossii (Chuzherodnye vidy rastenij v ekosistemah Srednej Rossii) / RAN; GBS RAN im. N. N. Cicina. Moscow : GEOS, 2009, pp. 188–194 (494 p.) [in Russian]
29. Yaroshevich M. I., Vecher N. N., Gorny A. V. Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) – promising culture // Theoretical and applied aspects of plant introduction as a promising direction for the development of science and national economy. Materials of the International Scientific Conference dedicated to the 75th anniversary of the founding of CBS NAN Belarusi/ NAN Belarusi, CBS. Minsk : EditVV, 2007, vol. 1, pp. 323–325
30. Yaroshevich M. I., Vecher N. N., Gorny A. V. Topinambur (Helianthus tuberosus L.) – perspective culture // Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty introdukcii rastenij kak perspektivnogo napravleniya razvitiya nauki i narodnogo hozyajstva: /Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj 75- letiyu so dnya obrazovaniya CBS NAN Belarusi/ NAN Belarusi, CBS. Minsk : EditVV, 2007, vol. 1, pp. 323–325 [in Russian]
31. Zelenkov V. N. Topinambur (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Report 1. Biological aspects of plant development in nature and in Russia (literature review) // Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, 2017, vol. 2, pp. 71–78
32. Zelenkov V. N. Topinambur (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Soobshchenie 1. Biologicheskie aspekty razvitiya rasteniya v prirode i na territorii Rossii (obzor literatury), 2017/2. Vestnik Rossiyskoy Akademii estestvennyh nauk, 74 (biologiya), pp. 71–78 [in Russian]
33. Zhukovskij P. M. Jerusalem artichoke // In : Cultivated plants and their relatives, Leningrad : Kolos, 1971, pp. 293–295
34. Zhukovskij P. M. Topinambur // In : Kul'turnye rasteniya i ih sorodichi. Leningrad : Kolos, 1971, pp. 293– 295 [in Russian]
35. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Топинамбур, дата обращения 04.09.2018.
36. http://geolike.ru/page/gl_214.htm, дата обращения 04.09.2018.
37. https://www.topinambour.ru/information/170928214313.html, дата обращения 04.09.2018.
38. https://www.syl.ru/article/95682/topinambur-poleznyie-svoystva, дата обращения 04.09.2018.
Review
For citations:
Smekalova T.N., Lebedeva N.V., Novikova L.Yu., Ljubchenko A.V. Morphological features of the inflorescence in jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) accessions from the VIR collection. Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding. 2018;179(4):128-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2018-4-128-140