Preview

Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding

Advanced search

Maintenance of inflorescence size variability within common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) cultivars of various origin: the phenomenon and its possible causes

https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2024-3-147-156

Abstract

Background. Intrapopulation polymorphism usually can be interpreted as a result of balancing selection, but the basic mechanisms of such selection are not always clear. Earlier we documented a wide variation in the inflorescence size within one of the most genetically uniform common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) cultivar ‘Skorospelaya 86’, with larger sizes controlled by recessive alleles of multiple genes. The objective of the present work was to analyze the variation within a set of buckwheat cultivars representing different morphological types of the crop, and try to make out possible mechanisms that underlie it.
Material and methods. A set of buckwheat cultivars of various origin and belonging to different morphological types were analyzed. The size of inflorescences was assessed as a number of their iterative subunits, i.e., partial floret clusters (PFCs). The number of mature seeds in the entire inflorescence and various PFCs was also counted.
Results and conclusions. All the cultivars were variable, with the range at the species level from 6 to 24 PFCs. Accumulation of the genes determining a larger inflorescence seems to be simply explained: larger inflorescences tended to produce more seeds than smaller ones. However, it is not so easy to explain the maintenance of the inflorescence size variability, i.e., why the alleles determining small inflorescences were not lost during the artificial selection for higher seed productivity. Probably, such polymorphism may be useful for maintaining heterosis at the population level.

About the Authors

A. N. Fesenko
Federal Scientific Center of Legumes and Groat Crops
Russian Federation

Aleksey N. Fesenko, Dr. Sci. (Biology), Head of a Laboratory 

10, bldg. 1, Molodezhnaya St., Streletsky Settlem., Orel 302502



I. N. Fesenko
Federal Scientific Center of Legumes and Groat Crops
Russian Federation

Ivan N. Fesenko, Dr. Sci. (Biology), Chief Researcher 

10, bldg. 1, Molodezhnaya St., Streletsky Settlem., Orel 302502



O. V. Biryukova
Federal Scientific Center of Legumes and Groat Crops
Russian Federation

Oksana V. Biryukova, Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Leading Researcher 

10, bldg. 1, Molodezhnaya St., Streletsky Settlem., Orel 302502



References

1. Amelin A.V., Fesenko A.N., Chekalin E.I., Fesenko I.N., Zaikin V.V. Higher yielding varieties of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) with determinate growth habit (single mutation det) manifest higher photosynthesis rate at stage of grain filling. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica. 2020;115(1):59-65. DOI: 10.14720/aas.2020.115.1.1316

2. Dart S.R., Samis K.E., Austen E., Eckert C.G. Broad geographic covariation between floral traits and the mating system in Camissoniopsis cheiranthifolia (Onagraceae): multiple stable mixed mating systems across the species’ range? Annals of Botany. 2012;109(3):599-611. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr266

3. Delph L.F., Kelly J.K. On the importance of balancing selection in plants. New Phytologist. 2014;201(1):45-56. DOI: 10.1111/nph.12441

4. Dyer G.A., López-Feldman A., Yúnez-Naude A., Taylor J.E. Genetic erosion in maize’s center of origin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111(39):14094-14099. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407033111

5. Fesenko A.N., Fesenko I.N. Buckwheat breeding and production in Russia during the past 100 years. Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding. 2019;180(1):113-117. [in Russian] DOI: 10.30901/2227-8834-2019-1-113-117

6. Fesenko A.N., Fesenko N.N., Romanova O.I., Fesenko I.N. Chapter twenty three – Main morphological types of cultivated buckwheat populations in Russia. In: M. Zhou, I. Kreft, G. Suvorova, Y. Tang, S.H. Woo (eds). Buckwheat Germplasm in the World. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2018. p.235-248. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811006-5.00023-9

7. Fesenko A.N., Fesenko N.N., Romanova O.I., Fesenko I.N. Crop evolution of buckwheat in Eastern Europe: microevolutionary trends in the secondary center of buckwheat genetic diversity. In: M. Zhou, I. Kreft, S.H. Woo, N. Chrungoo, G. Wieslander (eds). Molecular Breeding and Nutritional Aspects of Buckwheat. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2016. p.25-16. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-803692-1.00008-0

8. Fesenko I.N., Fesenko A.N. Genetic basis of interspecific diversity of floral display size between cultivated outcrosser Fagopyrum esculentum Moench and wild selfer F. homotropicum Ohnishi. Fagopyrum. 2011;28:17-21.

9. Fesenko N.N., Fesenko I.N. Inheritance analysis of the S4/SHT fragment of linkage group #4 supports allopolyploid origin and reveals genome composition of a tetraploid (2n=32) lineage of Fagopyrum homotropicum Ohnishi. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 2015;301(8):2141-2146. DOI: 10.1007/s00606-015-1217-y

10. Fesenko N.V. Breeding and seed production of buckwheat (Selektsiya i semenovodstvo grechikhi). Moscow: Kolos; 1983. [in Russian]

11. Fu Y.B. Understanding crop genetic diversity under modern plant breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2015;128(11):2131-2142. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-015-2585-y

12. Gulisija D., Kim Y. Emergence of long-term balanced polymorphism under cyclic selection of spatially variable magnitude. Evolution. 2015;69(4):979-992. DOI: 10.1111/evo.12630

13. Howard A.F., Barrows E.M. Self-pollination rate and floral-display size in Asclepias syriaca (common milkweed) with regard to floral-visitor taxa. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2014;14:144. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-144

14. Kaschuk G., Yin X., Hungria M., Leffelaar P.A., Giller K.E., Kuyper T.W. Photosynthetic adaptation of soybean due to varying effectiveness of N2 fixation by two distinct Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2012;76:1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.10.002

15. Krizek B.A., Anderson J.T. Control of flower size. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2013;64(6):1427-1437. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ert025

16. Lazareva T.N., Fesenko I.N. Seed protein variability of Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn. is limited by two types of electrophoresis spectrum, which differ by the presence/absence of one band. Fagopyrum. 2007;24:9-13.

17. Lazareva T.N., Pаvlоvskаya N.Y., Fesenko I.N., Fesenko A.N. Polymorphism of regionally released common buckwheat varieties revealed by electrophoresis of seed proteins. Russian Agricultural Sciences. 2007;33(6):364-366. DOI: 10.3103/S1068367407060043

18. Ohnishi O. Search for the wild ancestor of common buckwheat III. The wild ancestor of cultivated common buckwheat, and of tartary buckwheat. Economic Botany. 1998;52(2):123-133. DOI: 10.1007/BF02861199

19. Oliveira M.L.F., Pereira T.N.S., Barbosa R.M., Viana A.P. Analysis of the reproduction mode in Psidium spp. using the pollen: ovule ratio. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy. 2021;43(1):e44062. DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v43i1.44062

20. Solbrig O.T. A cost-benefit analysis of recombination in plants. In: O.T. Solbrig, S. Jain, G.B. Johnson, P.H. Raven (eds). Topics in Plant Population Biology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1979. p.114-130.

21. White J. The plant as a metapopulation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 1979;10:109-145. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.000545


Review

For citations:


Fesenko A.N., Fesenko I.N., Biryukova O.V. Maintenance of inflorescence size variability within common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) cultivars of various origin: the phenomenon and its possible causes. Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding. 2024;185(3):147-156. https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2024-3-147-156

Views: 176


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2227-8834 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0982 (Online)