In situ and ex situ variability of phenological and morphological features in Caltha palustris L. under the conditions of the West Siberian forest steppe

Background. Caltha palustris L. is known as a medicinal, food, and ornamental plant. It is a circumboreal species, and hygrohelophyte. Due to its ecological specificity, this plant can be used to study the response to an abrupt change in environments. The goal was to assess the variance in phenological and morphological features of C. palustris in the forest steppe of Western Siberia.

Materials and methods. Phenotypic characters of the native population and the accessions introduced from Kemerovo Province and Altai Territory were studied. Phenological observations followed a well-known technique for herbaceous perennials. Morphometric data were processed in the PAST program using statistical indicators: the arithmetic mean with an error (M ± m_M), minimum and maximum values of the trait (lim), and coefficient of variation (C_v). Significance of differences was assessed using Student’s t-test (P_t) at a 5% significance level. For traits deviating from the normal distribution, the significance of differences was assessed using the Mann–Whitney criterion (P_MW) by median values of the trait (Me) at the same 5% level.

Results and conclusions. The accessions varied significantly in the timing and duration of phenophases. Plants in the native population grew later and bloomed for a long time because of the variation in microconditions. Ex situ plants produced the second generation of rosette shoots and were capable of long vegetating, but the Altai accession differed in later growth and shorter phenophases. All accessions significantly differed in morphological characteristics of the shoot, except for flower size. The introduced accessions were inferior to the native ones in shoot height, leaf size, and number of flowers due to non-optimal cultivation environments. Since C. palustris demonstrated high individual and interpopulation variability, it is promising to study this species in different natural populations and select the most ornamental and sustainable accessions.

1. Банаев Е.В., Власенко А.В., Власенко И.А., Горбунова И.А., Зыкова Е.Ю., Королюк А.Ю., Королюк Е.А., Лащинский Н.Н., Мамонтов Ю.С., Науменко Ю.В., Писаренко О.Ю., Пшеничкина Ю.А., Седельникова Н.В., Томошевич М.А. Растительное многообразие Центрального сибирского ботанического сада СО РАН / под ред. И.Ю. Коропачинского, Е.В. Банаева. Новосибирск: Гео; 201).

2. Бейдеман И.Н. Методика изучения фенологии растений и растительных сообществ. Новосибирск: Наука; 1974.

3. Birό E., Babai D., Bόdis J., Molnár Z. Lack of knowledge or loss of knowledge? Traditional ecological knowledge of population dynamics of threatened plant species in East-Central Europe. Journal for Nature Conservation. 2014;22(4):318- 325. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2014.02.006

4. Blagojević J., Jovanović V., Adnađević T., Budinski I., Vujošević M. Chromosome status of marsh marigold, Caltha palustris L. (Ranunculaceae) from Serbia. Genetika. 2013;45(3):793-798. DOI: 10.2298/GENSR1303793B

5. Brotherton S.J., Joyce C.B., Berg M., Awcock G.J. Immediate and lag effects of hydrological change on floodplain grassland plants. Plant Ecology. 2019;220(3):345-359. DOI: 10.1007/s11258-019-00918-z

6. Ҫakir E.A. Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants of Iğdir Province (East Anatolia, Turkey). Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae. 2017;86(4):3568. DOI: 10.5586/asbp.3568

7. Cieślak E. Morphological variability of the Caltha palustris L. complex (Ranunculaceae) in Poland. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae. 2004;73(3):193-201. DOI: 10.5586/asbp.2004.026

8. Falińska K. Variability of Caltha palustris L. populations in garden culture. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae. 1981;50(3):493-513. DOI: 10.5586/asbp.1981.072

9. Fedyaeva V.V. (ed.). Red book of Rostov Province. Vol. 2. Plants (Krasnaya kniga Rostovskoy oblasti. T. 2. Rasteniya). 2nd ed. Rostov-on-Don: Ministry of Nature of Rostov Province; 2014. [in Russian] URL: http://www.ecodon.dspl.ru/docs/Красная%20книга%202014/Том%202%20Растения.pdf [дата обращения: 23.09.2021].

10. Fomina T.I. Marsh marigold ‒ Caltha L. (Kaluzhnitsa ‒ Caltha L.). In: V.P. Sedelnikov (ed.). Illustrated encyclopedia of plant life in Siberia (Illyustrirovannaya entsiklopediya rastitelnogo mira Sibiri). Novosibirsk: Arta; 2009. p.181. [in Russian]

11. Gleason H.A., Cronquist A. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. New York, NY: New York Botanical Garden; 1993.

12. Grootjans A.P., Fresco L.F.M., de Leeuw C.C., Schipper P.C. Degeneration of species-rich Calthion palustris hay meadows; some considerations on the community concept. Journal of Vegetation Science. 1996;7(2):185-194. DOI: 10.2307/3236318

13. Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T., Ryan P.D. PAST: paleontological statistics software. Package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 2001;4(1):4. Available from: http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/past.pdf [accessed Sept. 03, 2021].

14. Kang Y., Ɫuczay Ɫ., Kang J., Wang F., Hou J., Guo Q. Wild food plants used by the Tibetans of Gongba Valley (Zhouqu county, Gansu, China). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2014;10:20. DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-10-20

15. Krylova I.L. The rhythm of development of some wild plants under cultivation (Ritm razvitiya nekotorykh dikorastushchikh rasteniy v usloviyakh kultury). Bulletin Main Botanical Garden. 1967;(67):9-13. [in Russian]

16. Kumar P., Singhal V.K. Cytology of Caltha palustris L. (Ranunculaceae) from cold regions of Western Himalayas. Cytologia. 2008;73:137-143. DOI: 10.1508/CYTOLOGIA.73.137

17. Liakh V., Konechna R., Mylyanych A., Zhurakhivska L., Hubytska I., Novikov V. Caltha palustris. Analytical overview. ScienceRise: Pharmaceutical Science. 2020;2(24):51- 56. DOI: 10.15587/2519-4852.2020.201616

18. Lindborg R., Ermold M., Kuglerová L., Jansson R., Larson K.W., Milbau A. et al. How does a wetland plant respond to increasing temperature along a latitudinal gradient? Ecology and Evolution. 2021;11(22):16228-16238. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8303

19. Malyschev L.I., Peschkova (eds). Flora of Siberia. Vol. 6. Portulacaceae ‒ Ranunculaceae. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2003.

20. Martynov A.M., Dul V.N., Dargaeva T.D., Chuparina Ye.V. Study of chemical composition of marsh marigold grass (Caltha palustris L.). Journal of Pharmaceuticals Quality Assurance Issue. 2017;4(18):66-71. [in Russian]

21. Parzych A., Jonczak J., Sobisz Z. Bioaccumulation of macroand micronutrients in herbaceous plants of headwater areas – a case study from northern Poland. Journal of Elementology. 2018;23(1):231-245. DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2017.22.1.1415

22. Plant resources of the USSR: Flowering plants, their chemical composition, and utilization. Vol. 1. Magnoliaceae ‒ Limoniaceae families (Rastitelnye resursy SSSR: Tsvetkovye rasteniya, ikh khimicheskiy sostav, ispolzovaniye. T. 1. Semeystva Magnoliaceae ‒ Limoniaceae). Leningrad: Nauka; 1984. [in Russian]

23. Samoylov B.L., Morozova G.V. (eds). Red book of the City of Moscow (Krasnaya kniga goroda Moskvy). 2nd ed. Moscow; 2011. [in Russian]

24. Skvortsov A.K. Intraspecific variability and new approaches to plant introduction (Vnutrividovaya izmenchivost i novye podkhody k introduktsii rasteniy). Bulletin Main Botanical Garden. 1986;(140):18-25. [in Russian]

25. Woodell S.R.J., Kootin-Sanwu M. Intraspecific variation in Caltha palustris. New Phytologist. 1971;70(1):173-186. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1971.tb02522.x

26. Yena A.V., Fateryga A.V. (eds). Red book of the Republic of Crimea. Plants, algae and fungi. Simferopol: ARIAL; 2015. [in Russian] URL: https://meco.rk.gov.ru/file/Krasnaja_kniga_Respubliki_Krym_2015.pdf [дата обращения: 09.09.2021].

27. Zaitsev G.N. Methodology of biometric calculations. Mathematical statistics in experimental botany (Metodika biometricheskikh raschetov. Matematicheskaya statistika v eksperimentalnoy botanike). Мoscow: Nauka; 1973. [in Russian]