Preview

Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding

Advanced search

Genetic structure of the collection of ryegrass (Lolium) cultivars: a study based on SSR and SCoT markers

https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2023-3-146-160

Abstract

Background. Current molecular and genetic approaches make it possible to accelerate ryegrass breeding, simplify source material evaluation, and increase its accuracy. The efficiency of PCR-based SSR and SCoT marker techniques was studied in the context of evaluating the genetic structure of annual and perennial ryegrass accessions and defining DNA-identifying markers.

Materials and methods. Genomic DNA was isolated from the aggregate sample of 30 seedlings from each of the 15 analyzed cultivars according to the modified SDS DNA extraction protocol. In total, 20 SSR and 22 SCoT markers were used to assess genetic polymorphism. Basic parameters of the markers’ informative efficiency were identified. Genetic relationships among the studied cultivars were analyzed on the basis of the Neighbor-Joining dendrogram and Bayesian model.

Results. To assess the genetic polymorphism of ryegrass species and varieties, 7 SSR loci were selected, for which 110 allelic variants were identified (34 alleles were unique for individual cultivars), and 9 SCoT loci, for which 78 polymorphic amplification fragments were identified, with 28 being cultivar-specific. The dendrogram of genetic similarity and modeling in the Structure v2.3.4 program according to the results of SSR and SCoT analyses distributed the cultivars by their traits according to their species, ploidy level, origin, and similarity. Based on PCoA, carried out using summarized data of SSR and SCoT analyses, a multidimensional diagram of genetic relationships among ryegrass cultivars was constructed.

Conclusions. The systems of SSR and SCoT markers appeared to be an efficient tool to reveal genetic polymorphism and identify differences among ryegrass species and cultivars. We found unique DNA profiles that can be used for genetic identification. The results of the study have practical significance in cultivar-specific identification and selection of cultivars for various purposes.

About the Authors

Yu. M. Mavlyutov
Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology; Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

Yulian M. Mavlyutov, Researcher, Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology, Postgraduate Student, Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timi- ryazev Agricultural Academy

Bldg. 1, Scientific Campus, Lobnya, Moscow Province 141055,

49 Timiryazevskaya St., Moscow 127550



E. A. Vertikova
Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

Elena A. Vertikova, Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Associate Professor, Professor

49 Timiryazevskaya St., Moscow 127550



A. O. Shamustakimova
Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology
Russian Federation

Anastasia O. Shamustakimova Researcher

Bldg. 1, Scientific Campus, Lobnya, Moscow Province 141055



I. A. Klimenko
Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology
Russian Federation

Irina A. Klimenko, Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Senior Researcher, Head of a Laboratory

Bldg. 1, Scientific Campus, Lobnya, Moscow Province 141055



References

1. Amar M.H., Biswas M.K., Zhang Z., Guo W.W. Exploitation of SSR, SRAP and CAPS-SNP markers for genetic diversity of Citrus germplasm collection. Scientia Horticulturae. 2011;128(3):220-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.01.021

2. Amiryousefi A., Hyvönen J., Poczai P. iMEC: Online marker efficiency calculator. Applications in Plant Sciences. 2018;6(6):e01159. DOI: 10.1002/aps3.1159

3. Bolaric S., Barth S., Melchinger A.E., Posselt U.K. Molecular genetic diversity within and among German ecotypes in comparison to European perennial ryegrass cultivars. Plant Breeding. 2005;124(3):257-262. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2005.01108.x

4. Bostan C., Rechitean D., Istrate-Schiller C., Horablaga N.M., Bordean M.D., Bostan Pinisoara N. et al. Feed quality and productivity in some varieties of Italian ryegrass – Lolium multiflorum Lam. Life Science and Sustainable Development. 2022;3(2):107-113. DOI: 10.58509/lssd.v3i2.215

5. Collard B.C.Y., Mackill D.J., Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism: a simple, novel DNA marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 2009;27(1):86-93. DOI: 10.1007/s11105-008-0060-5

6. Crossa J. Methodologies for estimating the sample size required for genetic conservation of outbreeding crops. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1989;77:153-161. DOI: 10.1007/BF00266180

7. Dyachenko O.V., Dronov A.V., Slezko E.I. Cultivation of perennial mixtures as an effective method of forage production in the Bryansk region. VESTNIK of the Bryansk State Agricultural Academy. 2016;6(58):29-33. [in Russian]

8. Earl D.A., VonHoldt B.M. Structure Harvester: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources. 2012;4(2):359-361. DOI: 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7

9. Evanno G., Regnaut S., Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology. 2005;14(8):2611-2620. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x

10. Falush D., Stephens M., Pritchard J.K. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics. 2003;164(4):1567- 1587. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/164.4.1567

11. Fojtík A. Methods of grass improvement used at the Plant Breeding Station Hladké Životice. Genetica Polonica. 1994;35(A):25-31.

12. Forster J.W., Jones E.S., Kölliker R., Drayton M.C., Dumsday J.L., Dupal M.P. et al. Development and implementation of molecular markers for forage crop improvement. In: G. Spandenberg (ed.). Molecular Breeding of Forage Crops: Developments in Plant Breeding. Vol. 10. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium, Lorne and Hamilton, Victoria, Australia, November 19–24, 2000. Dordrecht: Springer; 2000. p.101-133. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9700-5_6

13. Forster J.W., Jones E.S., Kölliker R., Drayton M.C., Dupal M.P., Guthridge K.M. et al. Application of DNA profiling to an outbreeding forage species. In: R.J. Henry (ed.). Plant Genotyping: the DNA Fingerprinting of Plants. Oxford: CABI; 2001. p.299-320. DOI: 10.1079/9780851995151.0299

14. Guo Z.H., Fu K.X., Zhang X.Q., Zhang C.L., Sun M., Huang T. et al. SSRs transferability and genetic diversity of three allogamous ryegrass species. Comptes Rendus Biologies. 2016;339(2):60-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2015.12.004

15. Guthridge K.M., Dupal M.P., Kölliker R., Jones E.S., Smith K.F., Forster J.W. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and between populations of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L). Euphytica. 2001;122:191-201. DOI: 10.1023/A:1012658315290

16. Huff D.R. RAPD characterization of heterogenous perennial ryegrass cultivars. Crop Science. 1997;37(2):557-564. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020041x

17. Jiang L.F., Qi X., Zhang X.Q., Huang L.K., Ma X., Xie W.G. Analysis of diversity and relationships among orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) accessions using start codon-targeted markers. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2014;13(2):4406- 4418. DOI: 10.4238/2014.June.11.4

18. Jones E.S., Dupal M.P., Kölliker R., Drayton M.C., Forster J.W. Development and characterisation of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2001;102:405- 415. DOI: 10.1007/s001220051661

19. Kilchevsky A.V., Khotyleva L.V. (eds). Genetic foundations of plant breeding (Geneticheskiye osnovy selektsii rasteniy). Minsk: National Academy of Sciences of Belarus; 2012. [in Russian]

20. Klimenko I.A., Kozlov N.N., Kostenko S.I., Shamustakimova A.O., Mavlyutov Y.M. Identification and certification of forage grasses (meadow clover, alfalfa, sowing and hop) based on DNA markers: guidelines. Lobnya: Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology; 2020. [in Russian] DOI: 10.33814/978-5-6043194-9-9

21. Klimenko I.A., Kozlov N.N., Shamustakimova A.O., Dushkin V.A. Investigation of forage crops genetic diversity using molecular DNA markers. Adaptive Fodder Production. 2019;(4):89-100. [in Russian] DOI: 10.33814/AFP-2222-5366-2019-4-89-100

22. Kölliker R, Jones E.S, Jahufer M.Z.Z., Forster J.W. Bulked AFLP analysis for the assessment of genetic diversity in white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Euphytica. 2001;121(3):305-315. DOI: 10.1023/A:1012048103585

23. Konarev A.V., Perchuk I.N. Protein markers are an effective tool for assessing the state of in situ and ex situ genetic diversity, seed quality, as well as supporting the breeding process in cereal grasses (Belkovye markery – effektivny instrument otsenki sostoyaniya in-situ i ex-situ-geneticheskogo raznoobraziya, kachestva semenovodstva, a takzhe soprovozhdeniya selektsionnogo protsessa u zlakovykh trav). In: The current state and prospects for development of meadow fodder production in the 21st century. Proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference (Sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivy razvitiya lugovogo kormoproizvodstva v XXI veke. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Agrarian University; 2018. p.57-65. [in Russian]

24. Kosolapov V.M., Kostenko S.I., Pilipko S.V. Adaptive variety of food and herbs for extreme conditions of Russia. Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC. 2013a;(7):71-73. [in Russian]

25. Kosolapov V.M., Shamsutdinov Z.Sh., Kostenko S.I., Pilipko S.V., Tyurin Yu.S., Piskovatsky Yu.M., Novoselov M.Yu., Kozlov N.N., Perepravo N.I., Solozhentseva L.F., Stepanova G.V., Korovina V.L., Klochkova V.S., Drobysheva L.V., Zyatchina G.P., Piskovatskaya R.G., Starshinova O.A., Makaeva A.M., Shmatkova A.A., Volovik V.T., Sergeeva S.E., Zolotarev V.N., Shamsutdinova E.Z., Razgulyaeva N.V., Kostenko N.Yu., Putsa N.M., Korenev V.B., Ivanov I.S., Saprykina N.V., Truzina L.A., Chuykov V.A., Georgiadi N.I. Fodder crop cultivars bred at the Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology (Sorta kormovykh kultur selektsii FGBNU “Federalny nauchny tsentr kormoproizvodstva i agroekologii imeni V.R. Vilyamsa”). Lobnya: Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology; 2019. [in Russian] URL: https://www.vniikormov.ru/pdf/sorta-kormovyhkultur-selekcii-vik.pdf [дата обращения: 16.02.2023].

26. Kosolapov V.M., Trofimov I.A., Trofimova L.S. Balanced development to forage production (Kormoproizvodstvu – sba lansirovannoye razvitiye). APK: Ekonomika, upravleniye = AIC: Economics, Management. 2013b;(7):15-23. [in Russian]

27. Kostenko S.I., Kosolapov V.M., Pilipko S.V., Kostenko E.S. Breeding perennial gramineous for adaptive forage production. Fodder Production. 2016;(8):35-39. [in Russian]

28. Kubik C., Sawkins M., Meyer W.A., Gaut B.S. Genetic diversity in seven perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) cultivars based on SSR markers. Crop Science. 2001;41(5):1565-1572. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2001.4151565x

29. Lauvergeat V., Barre P., Bonnet M., Ghesquière M. Sixty simple sequence repeat markers for use in the Festuca– Lolium complex of grasses. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2005;5(2):401-405. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.00941.x

30. Liu S., Feuerstein U., Luesink W., Schulze S., Asp T., Studer B. et al. DArT, SNP, and SSR analyses of genetic diversity in Lolium perenne L. using bulk sampling. BMC Genetics. 2018;19(1):10. DOI: 10.1186/s12863-017-0589-0

31. Loera-Sánchez M., Studer B., Kölliker R. DNA-based assessment of genetic diversity in grassland plant species: challenges, approaches, and applications. Agronomy. 2019;9(12):881. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy9120881

32. Muylle H., Baert J., Van Bockstaele E., Moerkerke B., Goetghebeur E., Roldán-Ruiz I. Identification of molecular markers linked with crown rust (Puccinia coronata f. sp. lolii) resistance in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) using AFLP markers and a bulked segregant approach. Euphytica. 2005;143(1):135-144. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-005-3058-1

33. Nie G., Huang T., Ma X., Huang L., Peng Y., Yan Y. et al. Genetic variability evaluation and cultivar identification of tetraploid annual ryegrass using SSR markers. PeerJ. 20019;7:e7742. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7742

34. Omasheva M.E., Aubakirova K.P., Ryabushkina N.A. Molecular markers. Causes and consequences of genotyping errors (Molekulyarnye markery. Prichiny i posledstviya oshibok genotipirovaniya). Biotechnology. Theory and Practice. 2013;(4):20-28. [in Russian] DOI: 10.11134/btp.4.2013.3

35. Pasquali E., Palumbo F., Barcaccia G. Assessment of the genetic distinctiveness and uniformity of pre-basic seed stocks of Italian ryegrass varieties. Genes. 2022;13(11):2097. DOI: 10.3390/genes13112097

36. Peakall R., Smouse P.E. GenAlEx 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2006;6(1):288-295. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x

37. Perrier X., Jacquemoud-Collet J.P. DARwin software. Paris: CIRAD; 2006. Available from: https://darwin.cirad.fr/ [accessed Mar. 02, 2023].

38. Pirnajmedin F., Majidi M.M., Barre P., Kölliker R., Saeidi G. Enhanced polycross breeding of tall fescue through marker-based paternity identification and estimation of combining ability. Euphytica. 2020;216(9):139. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-020-02671-1

39. Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945-959. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945

40. Safari H., Zebarjadi A., Kahrizi D., Jafari A.A. The study of inter-specific relationships of Bromus genus based on SCoT and ISSR molecular markers. Molecular Biology Reports. 2019;46(5):5209-5223. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-019-04978-2

41. State Register for Selection Achievements Admitted for Usage: [website]. [in Russian] URL: https://reestr.gossortrf.ru [дата обращения 01.02.2023].

42. Studer B., Asp T., Frei U., Hentrup S., Meally H., Guillard A., et al. Expressed sequence tag-derived microsatellite markers of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Molecular Breeding. 2008;21:533-548. DOI: 10.1007/s11032-007-9148-0

43. Sukhareva A.S., Kuluev B.R. DNA markers for genetic analysis of crops. Biomics. 2018;10(1):69-84. [in Russian] DOI: 10.31301/2221-6197.bmcs.2018-15

44. Sweeney P.M., Danneberger T.K. Random amplified polymorphic DNA in perennial ryegrass: A comparison of bulk samples vs. individuals. Horticultural Science. 1994;29(6):624- 626. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.29.6.624

45. Wang J., Dobrowolski M.P., Cogan N.O., Forster J.W., Smith K.F. Assignment of individual genotypes to specific forage cultivars of perennial ryegrass based on SSR markers. Crop Science. 2009;49(1):49-58. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0177

46. Yan H., Zhang Y., Zeng B., Yin G., Zhang X., Ji Y. et al. Genetic diversity and association of EST-SSR and SCoT markers with rust traits in orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.). Molecules. 2016;21(1):66. DOI: 10.3390/molecules21010066

47. Zeng B., Zhang Y., Huang L.K., Jiang X.M, Luo D., Yin G. Genetic diversity of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) germplasms with resistance to rust diseases revealed by Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 2014;54(1):96-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2013.12.028


Review

For citations:


Mavlyutov Yu.M., Vertikova E.A., Shamustakimova A.O., Klimenko I.A. Genetic structure of the collection of ryegrass (Lolium) cultivars: a study based on SSR and SCoT markers. Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding. 2023;184(3):146-160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2023-3-146-160

Views: 379


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2227-8834 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0982 (Online)