Preview

Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding

Advanced search

Phenotypic stability of spring bread wheat regenerant lines

https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2023-1-144-153

Abstract

Background. Selection of somaclonal variation under callus culture (СС) conditions is one of the methods of undirected genome change induction which has become actively used in the development of cultivars with high adaptive potential. The aim of the present study was the estimation of the applicability of dedifferentiated cell culture to obtain cultivars with different levels of phenotypic stability.
Materials and methods. Ten wheat regenerant lines (RLs), obtained under selective (NaCl, low pH, drought) and nonselective conditions on the basis of СС were assessed along with their donor genotypes or the ones considered equivalent to them (in the case where the breeding variety was a donor) under field conditions on plots of 1 m2. 1000 grain weight data were used for the evaluation of the agronomic (bi, s2di) and biological (σ2САСi) stability. The yield-based superiority measure (Pi) was also calculated.
Results. RLs from cv. ‘Novosibirskaya 15’ were more stable than their donor genotype from the biological viewpoint as well as from the agronomic one. The GGE-biplot analysis shows that they belong to the same “environment” (sector) with the vertex genotype ‘Novosibirskaya 15’ with bi being close to 1. Cv. ‘Tayozhnaya’ and its high-yielding salt tolerant RL RS(Tayozhnaya)3.6 were located in the opposite sectors and appeared to be highly stable genotypes. They are considered to be better adapted to low-yielding locations (bi < 0,7) along with the RZ(К-79-2)7.16 RL, selected for drought tolerance. The RLs from the high-yielding K-142-4 line showed a wide range of values of the stability parameters. They were better adapted to high-yielding locations than their reference genotype, cv. ‘Minusa’. Thus, its RL had a low stability of 1000 grain weight.
Conclusion. Consequently, cell selection is a valuable source of breeding material that differs significantly in phenotypic stability both from the donor genotype and from other RLs, developed under CC of the same donor plant.

About the Authors

V. Yu. Stupko
Krasnoyarsk Science Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk Research Institute of Agriculture – Division of KSC SB RAS
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Leading Researcher 

 66 Svobodny Ave., Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russia 



A. V. Sidorov
Krasnoyarsk Science Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk Research Institute of Agriculture – Division of KSC SB RAS
Russian Federation

 Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Leading Researcher, Head of a Laboratory 

 66 Svobodny Ave., Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russia 



References

1. Bome N.A., Weisfeld L.I., Babaev E.V., Bome A.Ya., Kolokolova N.N. Influence of phosphomide, a chemical mutagen, on agrobiological signs of soft spring wheat Triticum aestivum L. Agricultural Biology. 2017;52(3):570-579. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.15389/agro biology. 2017.3.570rus

2. Cheshkova A. Stability analysis for agricultural research (Agrostab). 2019. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/agrostab/agrostab.pdf [дата обращения: 05.05.2022].

3. Cheshkova A.F., Grebennikova I.G., Aleynikov A.F., Chanyshev D.I. Implementation of methods for assessing the stability of crop varieties in the Agrostab package of functions of R software environment. Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC. 2020a;34(7):91-96. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.24411/0235-2451-2020-10716

4. Cheshkova A.F., Stepochkin P.I., Aleynikov A.F., Grebennikova I.G., Ponomarenko V.I. A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2020b;24(3):267-275. DOI: 10.18699/VJ20.619

5. Eberhart S.A., Russell W.A. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science. 1966;6(1):36-40. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x

6. Gauch H.G., Piepho H.P., Annicchiarico P. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: further considerations. Crop Science. 2008;48(3):866-889. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2007.09.0513

7. Gubatov T., Delibaltova V. Evaluation of wheat varieties by the stability of grain yield in multienvironmental trails. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2020;26(2):384-394.

8. Khakimova A.G., Fadeeva I.D., Gazizov I.N., Mitrofanova O.P. Catalogue of the VIR Global Collection. Issue 925. Winter bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Agrobiological description, adaptability and stability of accessions in the north of the Middle Volga Region. O.P. Mitrofanova (ed.). St. Petersburg: VIR; 2020. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.30901/978-5-907145-53-5

9. Kilchevsky A.V. Genetic and ecological bases of plant breeding. The Herald of Vavilov Society for Geneticists and Breeding Scientists. 2005;9(4):518-526. [in Russian].

10. Krupin P.Yu., Divashuk M.E., Karlov G.I. Gene resources of perennial wild cereals involved in breeding to improve wheat crop (review). Agricultural Biology. 2019;54(3):409-425. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.15389/agrobiology.2019.3.409rus

11. Lin C.S., Binns M.R. A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivar × location data. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 1988;68(1):193-198. DOI: 10.4141/cjps88-018

12. Lin C.S., Binns M.R., Lefkovitch L.P. Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Science. 1986;26(5):894-900. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600050012x

13. Methods of state variety trials for agricultural crops (Metodika gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya selskokhozyaystvennykh kultur). Moscow: Kolos; 1985. [in Russian].

14. Nikitina E.D., Khlebova L.P., Pronina R.D. In vitro somaclonal variation as initial material for bread wheat breeding. Acta Biologica Sibirica. 2015;1(3-4):171-186. [in Russian].

15. Olivoto T., Lúcio A.D. metan: An R package for multi-environment trial analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2020;11(6):783-789. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13384

16. Pérez-Clemente R., Gómez-Cadenas A. In vitro tissue culture, a tool for the study and breeding of plants subjected to abiotic stress conditions. In: A. Leva, L.M.R. Rinaldi (eds). Recent Advances in Plant in vitro Culture. London: InTech; 2012. p.91-108. DOI: 10.5772/50671

17. Popolzukhina N.A., Popolzukhin P.V., Gaidar A.A., Parshutkin Yu.Yu., Yakunina N.A. Development of the adaptive spring bread wheat cultivar ‘Omskaya Yubileynaya’ under the conditions of the Siberian region. Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetic, and Breeding. 2020;181(4):120-126. [in Russian]. DOI 10.30901/2227-8834-2020-4-120-126

18. Pour-Aboughadareh A., Khalili M., Poczai P., Olivoto T. Stability indices to deciphering the genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) effect: an applicable review for use in plant breeding programs. Plants. 2022;11(3):414. DOI: 10.3390/plants11030414

19. Rozhanskaya O.A., Gorshkova E.M. In vitro culture as a source of biodiversity for soybean breeding. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2019;49(4):24-31. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.26898/0370-8799-2019-4-3

20. Stupko V.Yu., Lugovtsova S.Yu., Zobova N.V. Field evaluation of stress tolerant barley and wheat varieties in vitro creation effectiveness. Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC. 2014;(6):11-14. [in Russian].

21. Terletskaya N.V., Stupko V.Yu., Altayeva N.A., Kudrina N.O., Blavachinskaya I.V., Kurmanbayeva M.S. et al. Photosynthetic activity of Triticum dicoccum × Triticum aestivum alloplasmic lines during vegetation in connection with productivity traits under varying moister conditions. Photosynthetica. 2021;59(1):74-83. DOI: 10.32615/ps.2021.003

22. Yan W., Kang M.S. GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists and agronomists. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2003. DOI: 10.1201/9781420040371

23. Yan W., Kang M.S., Ma B., Woods S., Cornelius P.L. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science. 2007;47(2):643-653. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0374

24. Yegorova N.A., Stavtzeva I.V. Biotechnological methods of obtaining sage forms resistant to osmotic stress in vitro. Ecosystems, Their Optimization and Protection. 2013;8(27):93-100. [in Russian].

25. Zobova N.V., Lugovtsova S.Yu., Stupko V.Yu. Conditions for providing the effective regeneration processes in the culture of the barley, wheat and oat isolated germs. The Bulletin of KSAU. 2011;12(63):110-116. [in Russian].


Review

For citations:


Stupko V.Yu., Sidorov A.V. Phenotypic stability of spring bread wheat regenerant lines. Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding. 2023;184(1):144-153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2023-1-144-153

Views: 470


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2227-8834 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0982 (Online)