The use of drought resistance indices in the study of the spring bread wheat collection under the conditions of Aktobe Region

Background. Due to the global climate warming trend, the breeding of new drought-resistant cultivars of spring bread wheat remains a priority task for Western Kazakhstan breeders. However, an increase in resistance is often accompanied by a decrease in genotype productivity, and searching for an optimal combination of these characteristics is a trend in contemporary plant breeding.

Materials and methods. In 2017–2019, 175 spring bread wheat accessions from the collection of the N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR) and locally developed contemporary cultivars were studied under the conditions of Aktobe Agricultural Station. The field study was carried out according to VIR’s guidelines. To assess the drought tolerance of the accessions, the following indices were used: mean productivity (MP), stress tolerance (TOL), yield stability index (YSI), drought resistance index (DI), and stress tolerance index (STI).

Results and discussion. Drought tolerance indices were calculated for all accessions using yield data in the driest (2019) and more favorable (2017) year. The total score of ranks for all indices was calculated for each accession. The total score correlated most strongly with the yield in an unfavorable year. As a result, 20 cultivars with the best total scores were identified, including 11 accessions bred in Aktobe Region, the reference cultivar, and promising accessions from other countries.

Conclusion. The cultivars identified according to a set of indices are promising in terms of their use in breeding for drought resistance under the conditions of Aktobe Region. The proposed index system makes it possible to combine assessments of different drought tolerance aspects.

1. Al Mahmud A., Alam M.J., Kundu B.C., Skalicky M., Rahman M.M., Rahaman E.H.M.S. et al. Selection of suitable potato genotypes for late-sown heat stress conditions based on field performance and stress tolerance indices. Sustainability. 2021;13(5):2770. DOI: 10.3390/su13052770

2. Bellague D., M’Hammedi-Bouzina M., Abdelguerfi A. Measuring the performance of perennial alfalfa with drought tolerance indices. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 2016;76(3):273-284. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-58392016000300003

3. Bennani S., Nsarellah N., Jlibene M., Tadesse W., Birouk A., Ouabbou H. Efficiency of drought tolerance indices under different stress severities for bread wheat selection. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2017;11(04):395-405. DOI: 10.21475/ajcs.17.11.04.pne272

4. Beyene Z.K., Mekbib F., Abebe T., Asfaw A. Drought resistance indices for screening of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes. Turkish Journal of Agriculture – Food Science and Technology. 2019;7(8):1118-1124. DOI: 10.24925/turjaf.v7i8.1118-1124.2226

5. Bouslama M., Schapaugh Jr. W.T. Stress tolerance in soybeans. I. Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science. 1984;24(5):933-937. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026x

6. Davletov F.A., Gaynullina K.P., Ashiev A.R., Novikova L.Yu. Study of genetic diversity of collection material of pea (Pisum sativum L.) in conditions of Bashkortostan Republic. Grain Economy of Russia. 2014;(4):44-52. [in Russian]

7. Fernandez G.C.J Effective selection criteria for assessing stress tolerance. In: C.G. Kuo (ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress. Taiwan: AVRDC; 1992. p.257-270.

8. Kazakhstan’s Second National Communication to the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Astana: Ministry of Environment Protection; 2009. Available from: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/kaznc2e.pdf [accessed Mar. 31, 2022].

9. Lan J. Comparison of evaluating methods for agronomic drought resistance in crops. Acta Agriculturae Boreali­occidentalis Sinica. 1998;7:85-87.

10. Merezhko A.F. (ed.). Replenishment, preservation in vivo and study of the world collection of wheat, Aegilops and triticale: Guidelines (Popolneniye, sokhraneniye v zhivom vide i izucheniye mirovoy kollektsii pshenitsy, egilopsa i tritikale: Metodicheskiye ukazaniya). St. Petersburg: VIR; 1999. [in Russian]

11. Naghavi M.R., Pour-Aboughadareh A., Marouf K. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for screening some of corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars under environmental conditions. Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 2013;5(3):388-393. DOI: 10.15835/nsb.5.3.9049

12. Pakul V.N., Plisko L.G. Drought-resistance of varieties of spring soft wheat. International Research Journal. 2018;12-2(78):49-52. [in Russian] DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2018.78.12.046

13. Rosielle A.A., Hamblin J. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science. 1981;21(6):943-946. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x

14. Sharifi P., Astereki H., Sheikh F., Khorasanizadeh M. Evaluation of faba bean genotypes in normal and drought stress conditions by tolerance and susceptibility indices. Central Asian Journal of Plant Science Innovation. 2021;1(4):176-179.

15. Smirnova O.G., Pshenichnikova T.A. The relationship between the genetic status of the Vrn-1 locus and the size of the root system in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2021;25(8):805-811. DOI: 10.18699/VJ21.093

16. Talebi R., Fayaz F., Naji A.M. Effective selection criteria for assessing drought stress tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). General and Applied Plant Physiology. 2009;35(1-2):64-74.

17. Zaitsev G.N. Methodology of biometric calculations. Mathematical statistics in experimental botany (Metodika biometricheskikh raschetov. Matematicheskaya statistika v eksperimentalnoy botanike). Мoscow: Nauka; 1973. [in Russian]

18. Zauralov O.A. Strategy of adaptation of higher plants to unfavorable environmental conditions (Strategiya adaptatsii vysshikh rasteniy k neblagopriyatnym usloviyam sredy). Agricultural Biology. 2000;35(5):39-44. [in Russian]

19. Zotova L.P., Dzhataev S.A. Assessment of collective samples of spring soft wheat for droughtability in the conditions of North Kazakhstan. Bulletin of Science of the S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University. 2019;1(100):35-46. [in Russian]