Assessment of drought resistance in sorghum CMS lines based on various sterility sources

Background. Global climate changes have recently led to a more frequent occurrence of adverse factors and a decrease in the productivity of major crops. Sorghum is a highly drought-resistant crop that can tolerate long-term soil and air droughts with much lower harvest losses than wheat or barley. It is important to understand physiological mechanisms affecting drought tolerance when breeding efforts are aimed at improving the adaptability to abiotic conditions and productivity of sorghum hybrids.

Materials and methods. Twenty sterile lines of grain sorghum with 8 types of CMS were studied in 2019 and 2020 in the arid conditions of Saratov Province. Indicators of the leaf water regime were assessed according to VIR’s guidelines. Statistical processing of the research results was performed using the AGROS 2.09 software.

Results. The indicators of the leaf water regime that reflected differentiated responses of the CMS-line plants to the prevailing water and temperature stressors during the critical flowering period for sorghum were analyzed. Four CMS lines were identified according to the chosen set of indicators: they manifested 71.13–72.02% of total water content, 5.26–9.08% of water deficit, and 57.40–83.17% of water retention capacity on average for the two years of research. For the first time, the effect of CMS in sorghum on the manifestation of water regime indicators was registered. In isonuclear CMS lines, the greatest effect on drought resistance was shown by cytoplasm A3 versus A4 (with the Zheltozernoe 10 genome), cytoplasm A5 versus A1 (with the Karlik 4v genome), and M35-1A versus the analog on cytoplasm 9E (with the Pischevoe 614 genome).

Conclusion. It is shown that genetically different types of sterility can be used in breeding practice to increase the resistance to abiotic stressors in components of F₁ crosses and hybrids.

1. Abraha T., Githiri S., Kasili R., Araia W., Nyende A.B. Genetic variation among sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) landraces from Eritrea under post-flowering drought stress conditions. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2015;6(9):1410-1424. DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2015.69141

2. Amelework B., Shimelis H., Tongoona P., Laing M. Physiological mechanisms of drought tolerance in sorghum, genetic basis and breeding methods: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2015;10(31):3029-3040. DOI: 10.5897/AJAR2015.9595

3. Badigannavar A., Teme N., de Olivera A.C., Li G., Vaksmann M., Viana V.E. et al. Physiological, genetic and molecular basis of drought resilience in sorghum [Sorg hum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Indian Journal of Plant Physio logy. 2018;23(4):670-688. DOI: 10.1007/s40502-018-0416-2

4. Beck E.H., Fettig S., Knake C., Hartig K., Bhattarai T. Specific and unspecific responses of plants to cold and drought stress. Journal of Biosciences. 2007;32(3):501-510. DOI: 10.1007/s12038-007-0049-5

5. Blum A., Sullivan C.Y. The comparative drought resistance of landraces of sorghum and millet from dry and humid regions. Annals of Botany. 1986;57(6):835-846. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087168

6. Chandra-Shekara A.C., Prasanna B.M., Singh B.B., Unnikrishan K.V., Seetharam A. Effect of cytoplasm and cytoplasm-nuclear interaction on combining ability and heterosis for agronomic traits in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]. Euphytica. 2007;153(1):15-26. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-006-9194-4

7. Chaves M.M., Flexas J., Pinheiro C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany. 2009;103(4):551-560. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn125

8. Elkonin L., Kibalnik O., Zavalishina A., Gerashchenkov G. Genetic function of cytoplasm in plants with special emphasis on sorghum. In: C. Dejesus, L. Trask (eds). Chloroplasts and Cytoplasm. Structure and Function. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2018. p.97-155.

9. Emendack Y., Burke J., Sanchez J., Laza H.E., Hayes C. Agromorphological characterization of diverse sorghum lines for pre- and post-flowering drought tolerance. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2018;12(01):135-150. DOI: 10.21475/ajcs.18.12.01.pne790

10. Farooq M., Wahid A., Kobayashi N., Fujita D., Basra S.M.A. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2009;29(1):185-212. DOI: 10.1051/agro:2008021

11. Frankovskaya M.T., Papazov D.Yu., Ognyahik L.G. The influence of different types of CMS on the productivity of hybrids (Vliyaniye raznykh tipov TsMS na produktivnost gibridov). Kukuruza i sorgo = Maize and Sorghum. 1995;(3):4-5. [in Russian]

12. Ionova E.V. Drought and resistance to drought tolerance of spiked grain (review). Grain Economy of Russia. 2011;2(14):37-41. [in Russian].

13. Kibalnik O.P., Elkonin L.A. Influence of male sterility-inducing cytoplasm types on pigment content in leaves of the F1 grain sorghum hybrids. Russian Agricultural Sciences. 2009;(1):18-21. [in Russian].

14. Kibalnik O.P., Kameneva O.B. Accumulation of chlorophyll in the leaves of sorghum hybrids based on sterility sources А1, А2, А3, А4, А5, А6 (Nakopleniye khlorofilla v listyakh gibridov sorgo na osnove istochnikov sterilnosti А1, А2, А3, А4, А5, А6). In: M.S. Gins (ed.). Role of physiology and biochemistry in crop introduction and breeding (Rol fiziologii i biokhimii v introduktsii i selektsii selskokhozyaystvennykh rasteniy). Proceedings of the V International Scientific and Methodological Conference in 2 vol. Moscow, April 15–19, 2019. Vol. 1. Moscow: RUDN; 2019. p.324-327. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.22363/09358-2019-324-327

15. Kochubey A.A., Zaremuk R.S. Study of drought tolerance of hybrid material of home plum in southern Russia. Agrarian Science. 2020;(6):94-98. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.32634/0869-8155-2020-339-6-94-98

16. Martynov S.P. Statistical and biometrical genetic analysis in crop production and breeding. AGROS 2.09 software package (Statisticheskiy i biometriko-geneticheskiy analiz v rasteniyevodstve i selektsii. Paket programm “AGROS 2.09”). Tver; 1999. [in Russian].

17. Phuong N., Afolayan G., El Soda M., Stützel H., Wenzel W., Uptmoor R. Genetic dissection of pre-flowering growth and development in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench under well-watered and drought stress conditions. Agricultural Sciences. 2014;5(11):923-934. DOI: 10.4236/as.2014.511100

18. Reddy R.S., Patil J.V. Genetic enhancement of rabi sorghum: adapting the Indian Durras. Chennai: Academic Press; 2015.

19. Sanchez A.C., Subudhi P.K., Rosenow D.T., Nguyen H.T. Mapping QTLs associated with drought resistance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Plant Molecular Biology. 2002;48(5-6):713-726. DOI: 10.1023/a:1014894130270

20. Terletskaya N.V., Shcherban A.B., Nesterov M.A., Perfil’ev R.N., Salina E.A., Altayeva N.A. et al. Drought stress tolerance and photosynthetic activity of alloplasmic lines T. dicoccum × T. aestivum. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(9):3356. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21093356

21. Torop A.A., Chaikin V.V., Mamedov R.Z., Filatova I.A. Influence the types of cytoplasmic masculine sterility on winter rye qualities. Agrarian Science. 2014;(3):17-18. [in Russian].

22. Tyagi V., Dhillon S.K., Kaushik P., Kaur G., Characterization for drought tolerance and physiological efficiency in novel cytoplasmic male sterile sources of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Agronomy. 2018;8(10):232. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy8100232

23. Udovenko G.V. (ed.) Diagnostics of plant resistance to stress: a methodological guide (Diagnostika ustoychivosti rasteniy k stressovym vozdeystviyam: metodicheskoye rukovodstvo). Leningrad: VIR; 1988. [in Russian].