A LOW-COST METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF DUPLICATE HOLDINGS AMONG GENEBANK ACCESSIONS
https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2016-4-18-27
Abstract
A set of 185 pairs of accessions with the same name from the Russian and Nordic collections of barley were grown in the field in Pushkin and were scored by the same person using a set of morphological descriptors. No differences were detected in the majority of the pairs (63%).In four out of six pairs no differences were detected for any of the agro-botanical characters. The accessions are most likely duplicates. In 13% of the pairs, the accessions were probably distinct and another 24% fell in-between these categories and required further investigation. Simple screening can reduce the number of duplicates. [The work is dedicated to Sergey M. Alexanian, Vice Director for Foreign Relations of VIR, who passed away in 2014].
About the Authors
F. . Yndgaard
Nordic Genetic Resource Center (NordGen)
Sweden
Sweden
I. G. Loskutov
Federal Research Center the N.I.Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR); Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. O. Solberg
Nordic Genetic Resource Center (NordGen); AVRDC - The World Vegetable Center
Sweden
Sweden
O. N. Kovaleva
Federal Research Center the N.I.Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. . Kolodinska-Brantestam
University of Latvia, Institute of Biology; Nordic Genetic Resource Center (NordGen)
Latvia
Latvia
J. T. Svensson
Nordic Genetic Resource Center (NordGen)
Sweden
Sweden
References
1. Diederichsen A. Duplication assessments in Nordic Avena sativa accessions at the Canadian national genebank // Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2009, vol. 56, pp. 587-597
2. Dittbrenner A., Hensen I., Wesche K. Genetic structure and random amplified polymorphic DNA diversity of the rapidly declining Angelica palustris (Apiaceae) in Eastern Germany in relation to population size and seed production. // Plant Species Biology. 2005 vol. 20, p.191-200
3. ECPGR. A Strategic Framework for the Implementation of a European Genebank Integrated System (AEGIS). 2008, Rome, ECPGR and Bioversity International
4. Ellstrand N. C., Elam D. R Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservation // Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics.1993, vol. 24, pp. 217-242
5. Engels J. M. M., Maggioni L. AEGIS: a regionally based approach to PGR conservation. // In: Maxted N, Dulloo ME, Ford-Lloyd BV, Frese L, Iriondo J.M. and Pinheiro de Carvalho M.A.A. (eds.), Agrobiodiversity Conservation: Securing the Diversity of Crop Wild Relatives and Landraces. 2012, Wallingford: CAB International, pp. 321-326
6. FAO. Genebank Standards for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. 2014, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
7. FAO. The Second Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. 2010, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
8. FAO. The state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. 1998, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
9. Germeier C. U., Frese L. and Bucken S. Concepts and data models for treatment of duplicate groups and sharing of responsibilities in genetic resources information systems // Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2003, vol. 50, pp. 693-705
10. Gomez O. J., Blair M. W., Frankow-Lindberg B. E., Gullberg U. Comparative study of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces conserved ex situ in genebanks and in situ by farmers // Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2005, vol. 52, pp. 371-380
11. Hensen I., Oberpieler C. Effects of population size on genetic diversity and seed production in the rare Dictamnus albus (Rutaceae) in central Germany // Conservation Genetics, 2005, vol. 6, pp. 63-73
12. Leino M. W., Bostrom E., Hagenblad J.) Twentieth-century changes in the genetic composition of Swedish field pea metapopulations // Heredity, 2013, vol. 110, pp. 338-346
13. Лоскутов И. Г.,Ковалева О. Н., Блинова Е. В. Методические указания по изучению и сохранению мировой коллекции ячменя и овса. - СПб.: ВИР, 2012. - 63 с
14. Loskutov I.G. Vavilov and his institute. A history of the world collection of plant genetic resources in Russia. IPGRI. Rome. Italy, 1999, 190 p
15. Lund B., Ortiz R., Skovgaard I. M., Waugh R., Andersen S. B. Analysis of potential duplicates in barley gene bank collections using resampling of microsatellite data // Theor Appl Genet., 2003, vol. 106, pp. 1129-1138
16. Negri V., Tiranti B. Effectiveness of in situ and ex situ conservation of crop diversity. What a Phaseolus vulgaris L. landrace case study can tell us. // Genetica 2010, 138: 985-998
17. Ouborg N. J., Vergeer P., Mix C. The rough edges of the conservation genetics paradigm for plants // Journal of Ecology, 2006, vol. 94, pp. 1233-1248
18. Перчук И. Н., Конарев А. В., Лоскутов И. Г., Блинова Е. В., Новикова Л. Ю., Хорева В. И., Колодинска-Брантестам А. Белковые маркеры, морфологические и селекционные признаки в идентификации дублетных образцов культурного овса в коллекциях ВИР (Россия) и Нордического генного банка (NordGen, Швеция) // Тр. по прикл. бот., ген. и сел. 2016. Т. 177. № 3. С. 82-93
19. Plucknett D. L., Smith N. J. H., Williams J. T., Anishetty N. M. Gene banks and the world’s food. Princeton, New Jersey. 1987 Princeton University Press
20. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna. 2014. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.R-project.org/
21. Solberg S. O., Yndgaard F., Palme A. Morphological and phenological consequences of ex situ conservation of natural populations of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). // Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization (online); 2015, 1-12, Available at doi:10.1017/S1479262115000416
22. van Hintum T. J. L., Boukema I. W. Genetic resources of leafy vegetables. In: Lebeda A and Kristkova E (eds). EUCARPIA Leafy Vegetables ’99, Proceedings of the EUCARPIA Meeting on Leafy Vegetables Genetics and Breeding. 1999, Olomouc (Czech Republic): Palacky University, pp. 59-72
23. van Hintum T. J. L., Knupffer H. Duplication within and between germplasm collections I. Identifying duplication on the basis of passport data. // Genet Resources and Crop Evolution, 1995, vol. 42, pp. 127-133
24. van Hintum T. J. L., Visser D. L. Duplication within and between germplasm collections II. Duplication in four European barley collections. // Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 1995, vol. 42, pp. 135-145
25. van Treuren R., Bijlsma R., van Delden W., Ouborg N.J. The significance of genetic erosion in the process of extinction. I. Genetic differentiation in Salvia pratensis and Scabiosa columbaria in relation to population size // Heredity, 1991, vol. 66, pp. 181-189
26. van Treuren R., Engels J. M. M., Hoekstra R., van Hintum T. J. L. Optimization of the composition of crop collections for ex situ conservation. // Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization, 2009, vol. 7, p. 185-193
27. Vertucci C. W., Roos E. E. Theoretical basis of protocoles for seed storage. Plant Physiology. 1990, vol. 94, pp. 1019-1023
28. Vetelainen M. “To age with AEGIS” A report from the ECPGR/AEGIS workshop - Establishment of the European Forage Collection. 2012. Rome: ECPGR. Available at http://www.ecpgr.cgiar.org/ fileadmin/bioversity/ publications/pdfs/ 1655_AEGIS_ Forage_ WS_ Hungary_ 070612.pdf
29. Walters C. Principles for preserving germplasm in genebanks. In: Guerrant E, Havens K, Maunder M (eds) Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. 2004, Covelo, California: Island Press, pp. 442-453
Review
For citations:
Yndgaard F., Loskutov I.G., Solberg S.O., Kovaleva O.N., Kolodinska-Brantestam A., Svensson J.T. A LOW-COST METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF DUPLICATE HOLDINGS AMONG GENEBANK ACCESSIONS. Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding. 2016;177(4):18-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2016-4-18-27
Views:
677
Email this article 