vir-nwТруды по прикладной ботанике, генетике и селекцииProceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding2227-88342619-0982N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources10.30901/2227-8834-2019-4-99-112vir-nw-462Research ArticleГЕНЕТИКА КУЛЬТУРНЫХ РАСТЕНИЙ И ИХ ДИКИХ РОДИЧЕЙGENETICS OF CULTIVATED PLANTS AND THEIR WILD RELATIVESВзаимодействия «генотип – среда» и наследование количественных признаков в комбинации скрещивания семенного и бессемянного сортов винограда (Vitis vinifera L.)Genotype–environment interactions and inheritance of quantitative traits in a hybrid combination between seeded and seedless grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.)РойчевВ.RoychevV.

Пловдив 4000, бул. Менделеев, 12

12 Mendeleev Blvd., Plovdiv 4000

roytchev@yahoo.comАграрный Университет – ПловдивБолгарияAgricultural University – PlovdivBulgaria201907012020180499112Copyright © Ройчев В., 20202020Ройчев В.Roychev V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://elpub.vir.nw.ru/jour/article/view/462

Проведено исследование по выявлению взаимодействий «генотип – среда» и наследования количественных признаков в комбинации скрещивания семенного и бессемянного сортов винограда – Армира × Русалка 1. Было установлено, что отбор ценных гибридных форм будет более эффективным по признакам «цветение – размягчение ягод», «размягчение ягод – технологическая спелость», «масса грозди», «масса 100 ягод» и «кислотность». Взаимодействия доминантных генов со средой протекают гораздо более интенсивно по сравнению с взаимодей- ствиями аддитивных генов. Очень высокими показателями наследуемости в поколении F1 обладают признаки «распускание почек», «цветение», «распускание почек – цветение», «цветение – размягчение ягод», «размягчение ягод – технологическая спелость», «индекс формы ягоды (длина/ширина)», «масса 100 ягод», «сахаристость» и «кислотность». В зависимости от генетической стабильности доминантного параметра, взаимодействующего со средой, можно произвести сравнительную оценку для каждого признака и сообразно селекционной цели отобрать элитные растения – гибриды, сочетающие важнейшие хозяйственные признаки.

The genotype–environment interactions and the inheritance of quantitative traits in a hybrid combination between a seeded grapevine cultivar and a seedless one (Armira × Rusalka 1) have been studied. It has been found that the selection of valuable hybrid forms shall become more efficient when conducted according to the traits ‘flowering – berry softening’, ‘berry softening – technological maturity’, ‘cluster weight’, ‘weight of 100 berries’ and ‘acids’. Dominant gene interactions with the environment are characterized by significantly greater intensity in comparison to those of additive genes. Inheritance in F1 progeny manifests very high values for the traits ‘budding’, ‘flowering’, ‘budding – flowering’, ‘flowering – berry softening’, ‘berry softening – technological maturity’, ‘berry length’. ‘berry width’, ‘weight of 100 berries’, ‘sugars’ and ‘acids’. According to the genetic stability of the dominant parameter interacting with the environment, a comparative evaluation can be made for each trait and, depending on the selection purpose, elite hybrid plants can be singled out, which possess a combination of the most important commercial traits.

статистические моделигенетика количественных признаковаддитивные и доминантные генывлияние условий внешней средыstatistical modelsgenetics of quantitative traitsadditive and dominant genesinfluence of environmental conditionsReferencesAllard R.W., Bradshaw A.D., Implication of genotype–environmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci. 1964;4:503-508.Allard R.W., Bradshaw A.D., Implication of genotype–environmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci. 1964;4:503-508.Comstock R.E., Moll R.H., Genotype–environment interactions. In: W.D. Hanson, H.F. Robinson (eds). Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. Washington DC: NAS–NRC; 1963. p.164-196.Comstock R.E., Moll R.H., Genotype–environment interactions. In: W.D. Hanson, H.F. Robinson (eds). Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. Washington DC: NAS–NRC; 1963. p.164-196.Eberhart S.A., Russell W.A. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 1966;6(1):36-40. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011xEberhart S.A., Russell W.A. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 1966;6(1):36-40. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011xФедин М.А., Силис Д.Я., Смиряев А.В. Статистические методы генетического анализа. Москва: Колос; 1980).Fedin M.A., Silis D.Y., Smiryaev A.V. Statistical methods of genetic analysis (Statisticheskiye metody geneticheskogo analiza). Moscow: Kolos; 1980. [in Russian]Finlay K.W., Wilkinson G.N. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Austr. J. Agric. Res. 1963;14(6):742-754. DOI: 10.1071/AR9630742Finlay K.W., Wilkinson G.N. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Austr. J. Agric. Res. 1963;14(6):742-754. DOI: 10.1071/AR9630742Freeman G.H., Statistical methods for the analysis of genotype–environment interaction. Heredity. 1973;31(3):339-354 DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1973.90Freeman G.H., Statistical methods for the analysis of genotype–environment interaction. Heredity. 1973;31(3):339-354 DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1973.90Freeman G.H., Perkins J.M. Environmental and genotype–environmental components of variability VIII. Relation between genotypes grown in different environments and measures of these environments. Heredity. 1971;27:15-23. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1971.67Freeman G.H., Perkins J.M. Environmental and genotype–environmental components of variability VIII. Relation between genotypes grown in different environments and measures of these environments. Heredity. 1971;27:15-23. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1971.67Hill J., Genotype–environment interaction – a challenge for plant breeding. J. Agric. Sci. 1975;85(3):477-493. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600062365Hill J., Genotype–environment interaction – a challenge for plant breeding. J. Agric. Sci. 1975;85(3):477-493. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600062365Kearsey M.J. Biometrical genetics in breeding. In: M.D. Hayward, N.O. Bosemark, I. Romagosa (eds). Plant Breeding: Principles and prospects. London: Chapman & Hall; 1973. p.163-183.Kearsey M.J. Biometrical genetics in breeding. In: M.D. Hayward, N.O. Bosemark, I. Romagosa (eds). Plant Breeding: Principles and prospects. London: Chapman & Hall; 1973. p.163-183.Хотылева Л.В., Тарутина Л.А., Взаимодействие генотипа и среды (Методы оценки). Минск: Наука и техника; 1982.Khotyleva L.V., Tarutina L.A. Interaction of genotype and environment (Assessment methods) (Vzaimodeystviye genotipa i sredy [Metody otsenki]). Minsk: Nauka i tekhnika; 1982. [in Russian]Кильчевский А. В., Хотылева Л.В. Метод оценки адаптивной способности и стабильности генотипов, дифференцирующей способности среды. Сообщение I. Обоснование метода. Генетика. 1985;21(9):1481-1490.Kilchevsky A.V., Khotyleva L.V. A method for assessing the adaptive ability and stability of genotypes, through the differentiating environmental inϐluence. Communication I. Justiϐication of the method (Metod otsenki adaptivnoy sposobnosti i stabilnosti genotipov, differentsiiruyushchey sposobnosti sredy. Soobshcheniye I. Obosnovaniye metoda). Russian Journal of Genetics. 1985;21(9):1481-1490. [in Russian]Кильчевский А.В., Хотылева Л.В. Генотип и среда в селекции растений. Минск: Наука и техника; 1989.Kilchevsky A.V., Khotyleva L.V. Genotype and environment in plant breeding (Genotip i sreda v selektsii rasteniy). Minsk: Nauka i tekhnika; 1989. [in Russian]Лакин Г.Ф. Биометрия. Москва: Высшая школа; 1990.Lakin G.F. Biometrics (Biometriya). Moscow: Vysshaya shkola; 1990. [in Russian]Mather K., Caligari P.D. Genotype × environment interactions. IV. The effect of the background genotype. Heredity. 1976;36(1):41-48. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1976.4Mather K., Caligari P.D. Genotype × environment interactions. IV. The effect of the background genotype. Heredity. 1976;36(1):41-48. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1976.4Mather K., Jinks J.L. Biometrical Genetics: The study of continuous variations. New York: Cornell University Press; 1971. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.19730150511Mather K., Jinks J.L. Biometrical Genetics: The study of continuous variations. New York: Cornell University Press; 1971. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.19730150511Moreno-Gonzáles J. Selection strategies and choice of breeding methods. In: M.D. Hayward, N.O. Bosemark, I. Romagosa (eds). Plant Breeding: Principles and prospects. London: Chapman & Hall; 1993. p.281-313.Moreno-Gonzáles J. Selection strategies and choice of breeding methods. In: M.D. Hayward, N.O. Bosemark, I. Romagosa (eds). Plant Breeding: Principles and prospects. London: Chapman & Hall; 1993. p.281-313.Moreno-Gonzáles J., Cubero J.I., Choice of environments in reciprocal recurrent selection programs. Theor Appl Genet. 1986;71(4):652-656. DOI: 10.1007/BF00264271.Moreno-Gonzáles J., Cubero J.I., Choice of environments in reciprocal recurrent selection programs. Theor Appl Genet. 1986;71(4):652-656. DOI: 10.1007/BF00264271.Perkins J.M., Jinks J.L. Environmental and genotype–environmental components of variability. III. Multiple lines and cro sses. Heredity. 1968;23:339-356. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1968.48Perkins J.M., Jinks J.L. Environmental and genotype–environmental components of variability. III. Multiple lines and cro sses. Heredity. 1968;23:339-356. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1968.48Perkins J.M., Jinks J.L. Environmental and genotype–environmental components of variability IV. Non-linear interactions for multiple inbred lines. Heredity. 1968;23:525-535. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1968.71Perkins J.M., Jinks J.L. Environmental and genotype–environmental components of variability IV. Non-linear interactions for multiple inbred lines. Heredity. 1968;23:525-535. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1968.71Perkins J.M., Jinks J.L. Specificity of the interaction of genotypes with contrasting environments. Heredity. 1971;26(3):463-474.Perkins J.M., Jinks J.L. Specificity of the interaction of genotypes with contrasting environments. Heredity. 1971;26(3):463-474.Perkins J.M., Jinks J.L. The assessment and specificity of environmental and genotype–environmental components of variability. Heredity. 1973;30(2):111-126. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1973.16Perkins J.M., Jinks J.L. The assessment and specificity of environmental and genotype–environmental components of variability. Heredity. 1973;30(2):111-126. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1973.16Рокицкий П.Ф. Биологическая статистика. 3-е изд. Минск: «Вышэйшая школа»; 1973.Rokitsky P.F. Biological statistics (Biologisheskaya statistika). 3rd ed. Minsk: Vysheyshaya shkola; 1973. [in Russian]Ройчев В. Ампелография. Пловдив: Академично издательство на Аграрен Университет-Пловдив; 2012).Roychev R. Ampelography. Plovdiv: Agricultural University Academic Publishers; 2012. [in Bulgarian]Ройчев В. Руководство за упражнения по ампелография. Академично издательство на Аграрен Университет-Пловдив; 2014).Roychev R. Students’ guide to ampelography. Plovdiv: Agricultural University Academic Publishers; 2014. [in Bulgarian]Савченко В.К. Генетический анализ в сетевых пробных скрещиваниях. Минск: Наука и техника; 1984).Savchenko V.K. Genetic analysis in network test crosses (Geneticheskiy analiz v setevykh probnykh skreshchivaniyakh). Minsk: Nauka i tekhnika; 1984. [in Russian]

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.